WATCH: U.S. Rep. Miller live; Heated rhetoric in Congress; SNAP, ‘basic income’ debate
(The Center Square) – In today’s edition of Illinois in Focus Daily, The Center Square Editor Greg Bishop talks live with Illinois U.S. Rep. Mary Miller, R-Oakland, about some of her top issues facing Congress, from health insurance reform and SNAP funding to CLD enforcement.
Bishop also shares some highlights from a U.S. House hearing on the effects of anti-law enforcement rhetoric with Illinois taking centerstage throughout the hearing.
Finally, Bishop shares Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s reaction to the USDA looking to start withholding federal taxpayer dollars from states that do not comply with providing more information about Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program recipients. There’s also debate around guaranteed income programs like what Cook County is continuing. Pritzker shares his thoughts, as does potential rival Ted Dabrowski. A Democratic state representative is pushing legislation to prohibit tax dollars from being used for such programs.
Subscribe to Illinois in Focus Daily with The Center Square on YouTube. You can also subscribe to the Illinois in Focus podcast to get the entire show uninterrupted.
Latest News Stories
Illinois Quick Hits: State police investigating 2025 fatal ICE-involved shooting
Data shows more violent retail thefts, lost sales tax revenue.
Arizona GOP considers suing to redraw congressional map
Pro-life org releases updated pregnancy resource confirming life begins at conception
Illinois Quick Hits: Congressman’s aide indicted on fraud allegations
Social Security’s trust funds: asset, accounting tool or debt?
Fitzpatrick says pro-union bill dealing with contracts will pass U.S. House
Feds investigate LA schools for sexual misconduct allegations
Advocates criticize bipartisan housing bill
Johnson, municipal leaders statewide clash with Pritzker over local funding cuts
WATCH: Report: Washington high schools rank near bottom in personal finance literacy
Citizen Voting Amendment may avoid partisan SAVE Act pitfalls