U.S. Supreme Court to decide birthright citizenship case
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide a case challenging President Donald Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship.
On the first day of his second term, Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to refuse to recognize U.S. citizenship for children born in the U.S. to mothers who are in the country illegally or are here legally on visas if the father is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. The order also called for denying U.S. citizenship to those children born in the U.S. if at least one parent isn’t an American citizen or green card holder.
A U.S. Supreme Court ruling more than a century ago held that children born in the U.S. to foreign parents are U.S. citizens under the 14th Amendment. However, the Trump administration said the 14th Amendment has “never been interpreted” to give universal citizenship to everyone born in the country.
Section 1 of the 14th Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Several lower federal court judges blocked Trump’s attempts to end birthright citizenship in response to lawsuits filed by state attorneys general, mothers and others.
The Supreme Court already has heard arguments related to nationwide injunctions issued as a result of the legal challenges. Now it will decide the merits of Trump’s executive order.
A decision will is expected in 2026.
• Brett Rowland contributed to this report.
Latest News Stories
Open primary system debated as Californians go to polls
Illinois Quick Hits: Pritzker signs two bills
Elon Poll says 2 in 3 proud to be American and Signers would be disappointed
U.S. Supreme Court denies Florida request to sue over immigrant CDLs
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Beecher Village Board for May 11, 2026
Judge says federal rule blocks Illinois from banning ‘swipe fees’
Canadians, Brits stress U.S., Texas are key to shipbuilding
Tariff litigation expands as federal court weighs next move
Democrats dissatisfied by DOJ’s pause on ‘anti-weaponization fund’
Hegseth calls allied defense ‘bad deal for taxpayers’ in budget push
Pritzker touts state spending to cover federal cuts in passed budget
I-95 quintuple fatal: Federal agency subpoenas state of New York