European Union says U.S. consumers will end up paying tariffs
European Union leaders detailed the terms of a trade deal they struck with President Donald Trump on Thursday, making sure to point out who will pay for what in the massive deal.
Since retaking office, Trump has hit nearly every nation with new tariffs and is working to reshape global trade to give American companies homefield advantage. But it could cost U.S. consumers.
“Tariffs are paid by the company importing the imported goods. So, for tariffs imposed by the U.S., it is the American importer who pays,” according to a fact sheet on the deal from the 27-nation bloc. “For example, if a European company exports shoes to the U.S., the U.S. company buying these shoes owe the tariffs to the U.S. government.”
The White House has insisted that foreign nations and businesses will pay the tariffs, not American consumers.
In May, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “The president is committed to ensuring that prices remain low for American consumers and he maintains the position that foreign countries will absorb these tariffs.”
EU officials disagreed.
“In many cases, the importing company will push to offset some of this cost either by asking for a discount from the supplier or by raising the price for end consumers,” according to the release. “In the end, it is usually the consumers (in this case, U.S. consumers) who will indirectly pay for the tariffs.”
Alex Durante, a senior economist at The Tax Foundation, said that in the past, the cost of import duties was shared by businesses and consumers. However, that might not be the case going forward.
“Historically, economists have found that foreign firms absorbed some of the burden of tariffs by lowering their prices, resulting in a combination of foreign businesses and domestic firms and consumers sharing the burden of tariffs,” Durante said. “In contrast to past studies, however, recent studies have found the Trump tariffs were passed almost entirely through to U.S. firms or final consumers.”
Last month, the Federal Reserve’s latest anecdotal “beige book” survey found that businesses across the country reported passing the cost of tariffs on to U.S. consumers.
“Many firms passed on at least a portion of cost increases to consumers through price hikes or surcharges, although some held off raising prices because of customers’ growing price sensitivity, resulting in compressed profit margins,” according to the report.
Those higher prices could become more visible later this year, according to the report.
Economists, businesses and some publicly traded companies have warned that tariffs could raise prices on a wide range of consumer products throughout the U.S.
New tariffs raised $58.5 billion in revenue between January and June of this year before accounting for income and payroll tax offsets, according to an analysis of federal data from the Penn Wharton Budget Model. The study found that the average effective tariff rate increased to 9.14% in June from 2.2% in January, when Trump returned to office.
Trump has said he wants to use tariffs to restore manufacturing jobs lost to lower-wage countries in decades past, shift the tax burden away from U.S. families, and pay down the national debt.
A tariff is a tax on imported goods that the importer pays, not the producer. The importer pays the cost of the duties directly to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, a federal agency.
Latest News Stories
Sheridan Gorman’s mother to Congress: ‘Choose us’
Los Angeles Homeless Services Agency sues feds over funds
Renewed call for constitutional amendment after SCOTUS ruling
Cops can’t skip woman’s suit over ecstasy overdose from pills stuck in body
Seattle, King County to retake control of troubled regional homeless authority
Wisconsin group filed lawsuit against DPI over teacher license records
Federal crackdown targets two Minneapolis drug trafficking groups
Peterson, Kiros to square off in Denver’s congressional race
Legislators to consider bill designed to protect Altadena
Illinois politicians claim cautious win in birthright citizenship ruling
Tax system overhaul better than credits, think tank says
Wisconsin members of Congress split on Supreme Court rulings