Washington Township Asks Will County to Deny Beecher-Area Solar Farm
Washington Township Board Meeting | September 4, 2024
Article Summary: The Washington Township Board has formally stated its opposition to a proposed solar farm in Beecher’s “backyard,” sending a letter to Will County Zoning and Planning to deny the request. Supervisor Mike Stanula cited concerns over the loss of farmland, environmental disruption, and the long-term reliability of solar developers.
Solar Farm Opposition Key Points:
-
The board is opposing a zoning request and special use variance for the Siciliano Community Solar Garden, proposed by Wild Cat Solar 4 LLC.
-
Supervisor Mike Stanula sent a letter to Will County expressing concerns about the project’s impact on the landscape, farmland, and wildlife.
-
The letter states the township’s control is limited by state legislation but makes a formal recommendation against the project.
The Washington Township Board on Wednesday, September 4, 2024, took a formal stance against a proposed solar farm, directing Supervisor Mike Stanula to send a letter to Will County officials asking them to deny the project.
The project, named the Siciliano Community Solar Garden and proposed by Wild Cat Solar 4 LLC, is planned for an area described as “in Beechers’ backyard.” While the project has not yet been assigned a zoning case number by Will County, the township moved proactively to voice its opposition.
In the letter, addressed to the Beecher Plan Commission and copied to Will County officials, Stanula wrote, “We do not recommend the Zoning request nor the Special Use Variances for a Solar Farm.” He stated that such projects “continue to scar the landscape, replacing farmland which benefit our residents both regionally as well as nationally.”
The letter outlined several concerns, including the disruption of migratory birds and wildlife, loss of cropland, unnatural soil warming, and questions about the recyclability of solar panel components. Stanula also questioned the “longevity of the start-up solar developers to provide long term service and restoration of the property back to original ground.”
Stanula acknowledged the township’s limited authority over such projects due to state legislation favoring wind and solar energy. “We have our hands tied,” he wrote. “The best that we can do is to state our point of view and make recommendations.”
Mostly Sunny
2 Comments
Leave a Comment
Latest News Stories
Washington insiders: Social media more influential than traditional media, but few trust it
Ceasefire being tested as U.S., Iran continue to exchange fire
Supreme Court declines to hear COVID-19 vaccine case
Supreme Court agrees to hear prisoner release case
New Jersey city faces curfew after violent anti-ICE demonstrations
Property tax-free Bears deal fails to pass
Illinois Quick Hits: Loyola student’s alleged killer charged with new felony
$55.9 billion budget includes new taxes, ‘no property tax relief’
Illinois to require bell-to-bell student phone ban in public schools
Election 2026: Stumps heavy with economy, crime in U.S. Senate race
Quintuple fatal in Virginia renews focus on English language in CDL licensures
Everyday Economics: Jobs report to test how long consumers can keep carrying economy
Everyone needs to put the pressure on legislators in Springfield to change the laws on wind and solar. During the Veto Session the House passed SB25 and the Senate votes on it next. The bill will increase the cost of your electricity by making you pay for solar battery storage and it also discriminates against small business owners. Contact your State Senator now.
Is there a form we can fill out or a number to call to help vote this out?