Prosecutors defend indictment in Comey case after defense questions
Prosecutors defended how they presented the criminal case against former FBI boss James Comey to a grand jury after defense attorneys said the indictment failed to meet legal standards.
Defense attorneys had not filed a motion to challenge the indictment as of Thursday morning, but made it clear in court Wednesday they didn’t think it would pass scrutiny.
Michael Dreeben, an attorney for Comey, said: “There is no indictment.”
He also said the statute of limitations for the charges expired Sept. 30, making the claimed misstep “tantamount to a complete bar” on the prosecution.
In September, federal prosecutors alleged that Comey lied to Congress when he denied claims that he leaked classified documents to a news outlet over the Trump-Russia election interference hoax investigation. The two-page indictment charged Comey with making false statements to Congress and obstruction of justice related to leaked documents to The New York Times.
In a filing late Wednesday, prosecutors defended their handling of the grand jury.
“The record shows that a duly constituted grand jury considered the presented indictment and returned a true bill as to only Counts Two and Three,” Assistant United States Attorney N. Tyler Lemons wrote. “Considering Gaither and controlling Supreme Court and Fourth Circuit precedent, the government course of conduct here was permissible and proper.”
Comey’s defense also argued that the charges against the former FBI boss were the result of selective or vindictive prosecution. That can be a high bar to prove. President Donald Trump tried the same thing in several of the case filed against him in the run up to the 2024 election. Trump was convicted in New York, but three other cases against him stalled or were dismissed.
U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff, a Biden appointee, ordered both sides to provide him with answers to how the case should proceed.
The defense had not responded as of Thursday morning.
Latest News Stories
EXCLUSIVE: The Oversight Project calls for investigation into Fusus, Oak Brook contract
Will County Executive Committee Recommends 600 MW Pride of the Prairie Solar Project in 6-5 Split Vote
Beecher 200U Adopts District-Wide Cell Phone Policy, Tightens High School Discipline Steps
Europe tried wealth taxes. Most gave up.
Aging Systems and Judicial Mandates Drive Significant FY2027 Budget Requests for Will County Courts and Sheriff
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Planning and Zoning Commission for May 5, 2026
Colorado governor shortens Tina Peters’ sentence for election tampering
No ruling; Florida judge hears arguments in redistricting litigation
Debate grows over bill on gender, abortion care access in child placement
Lawsuit: D300 secretly gender transitioned student; Seeks to nix IL gender ‘guidance,’ too
WATCH: Family farm’s decade-long water war with Ecology waiting on WA Supreme Court
Beecher Powers Past Momence in 13-5 Conference Win