Sanctuary Status Threatens Emergency Management Funding, Draft Report Warns
Article Summary: Will County’s proposed federal agenda warns that critical emergency preparedness funding is being withheld due to a federal review of “sanctuary jurisdiction” compliance, leaving the county with only a fraction of necessary grant money.
Emergency Funding Key Points:
-
The Document: These figures were released as part of the Federal Legislative Agenda, a report outlining the county’s federal funding needs for FY2026.
-
Funding Gap: Will County reports it is currently receiving only 15% of its eligible Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) costs.
-
The Cause: The shortfall is linked to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) review regarding “sanctuary jurisdiction compliance.”
-
County Position: The draft agenda “strongly opposes punitive federal grant restrictions” and argues that funding local readiness is vital regardless of immigration policy.
A conflict over immigration policy is threatening the budget for Will County’s emergency preparedness, according to details released in the draft 2026 Federal Legislative Agenda.
The Federal Legislative Agenda serves as the county’s official “wish list” for federal action. In the public safety section of the draft presented Thursday, the Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) is described as a “cornerstone” of federal support for local disaster readiness. However, the document reveals the county is currently receiving only about 15% of its eligible EMPG costs.
The text cites an ongoing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) review related to “sanctuary jurisdiction compliance” as the cause for the funding hold-up. The draft agenda argues that emergency preparedness should not be tied to immigration enforcement.
“Despite this, its vital role in supporting local readiness must be preserved,” the agenda states. The legislative priority outlines a call for the restoration of the full 50% federal cost-share and advocates for safeguarding local eligibility throughout the DHS review process.
The document also connects this issue to broader community safety, stating: “Local immigration legal aid keeps families together, stabilizes our workforce, and builds trust so all residents feel safe seeking healthcare, education, and public services.” The full agenda was sent back to committee on Thursday for further refinement before final approval.
Latest News Stories
Illinois quick hits: Giannoulias orders village to stop sharing data with CBP
CA, Delaware attorneys general concerned about OpenAI
New York AG to appeal ruling tossing Trump’s $454M civil fraud penalty
Chevron petitons Supreme Court to move lawsuits to federal court
Business leaders eye immigration reform
Trump defends handling of Epstein controversy, says GOP doing ‘legendary’ job
In-home care rule change proposal generates more than 1,500 responses
Polis calls for return of Victims of Crime Act grant funding
Billions in investment, thousands of jobs coming to RGV from LNG facility, pipeline
Bessent says Federal Reserve ‘must change course’
Legislation to end cashless bail in D.C., nationwide introduced in Senate
Chicago ranks near bottom in survey of best and worst run cities