Dems sue over Trump's executive order on mail-in ballots

Dems sue over Trump’s executive order on mail-in ballots

Spread the love

Democratic officials from 23 states and the District of Columbia announced Friday they’re suing to block President Donald Trump’s recent executive order regulating mail-in and absentee ballots.

The suit was slated to be filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. A copy of the lawsuit wasn’t available as of press time.

Trump doesn’t have the constitutional authority to control elections, California Attorney General Rob Bonta told reporters during a news conference Friday morning. Bonta, a Democrat who’s co-leading the coalition of plaintiffs, noted the authority rests with states and Congress, not the federal executive branch.

“The framers of our Constitution made sure that how we choose our leaders is not put in the hands of a single leader” such as Trump, Bonta said.

Others co-leading the coalition of plaintiffs are Attorneys General Andrea Joy Campbell of Massachusetts, Aaron Ford of Nevada and Nick Brown of Washington state.

The Center Square reached out Friday morning to the White House, which noted the Republican president’s order was designed to secure elections.

“Only Democrat politicians and operatives would be upset about lawful efforts to secure American elections and ensure only eligible American citizens are casting ballots,” White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said, answering The Center Square’s questions by email. “President Trump campaigned on securing our elections, and the American people sent him back to the White House to get the job done.”

Trump’s executive order, which was issued on March 31, is titled “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections.” It cites the Help America Vote Act of 2002, the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the federal government’s obligation to ensure a republican form of government in every state under Article IV, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution. The order also refers to federal laws prohibiting non-citizens from registering to vote or voting in federal elections and the executive branch’s duty to enforce federal laws under Article II of the Constitution.

The executive order directs the secretary of homeland security to compile lists of U.S. citizens who are 18 or older and send them to the chief election official of each state. The order says the list would be based on federal citizenship and naturalization records, Social Security records, SAVE data (used to verify citizenship) and other federal databases.

The order says states must notify the U.S. Postal Service no fewer than 90 days before a federal election if they are using the postal service to deliver mail-in or absentee ballots. The order also says states must send a list of eligible voters to the postal service no fewer than 60 days before a federal election.

Bonta noted the order threatens states with loss of federal funding for failure to comply.

And he contended Trump’s executive order would disrupt the process in which every registered voter in California automatically gets a ballot in the mail.

“Protecting elections is not partisan. Every eligible voter should be able to vote,” Bonta said. “That is foundational to our democracy.”

Bonta said he doesn’t believe the executive order came soon enough to impact California’s June 2 primary, but said it could interfere with the Nov. 3 general election. He added Trump is concerned about Republicans losing congressional seats.

In addition to officials in California, Massachusetts, Washington state, Nevada and the District of Columbia, the lawsuit against Trump’s executive order is being filed by Democratic attorneys general from Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin. Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro is also among the plaintiffs.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.50.36 PM

Will County Legislative Committee News Briefs

Committee Postpones Action on Felony Conviction Voting Rights Bill: The Will County Legislative Committee declined to support House Bill 1288, which would allow individuals convicted of felonies to run for...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

Shanahan Development Agreements Near Completion, Will County to See $282,000 Annual Revenue Boost

Will County will soon begin receiving the full tax benefit from industrial developments in Shanahan as the tax abatement and rebate agreements that helped fund infrastructure improvements approach their completion...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

County Explores Bond Refinancing Options to Generate Potential Savings

Will County officials are exploring opportunities to refinance existing debt that could generate significant savings through two separate financial strategies, according to presentations to the Finance Committee on Thursday. Financial...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

County Approves $150,000 for Medicare/Medicaid Billing Consultant for Health Department, Nursing Home

Will County will hire a consultant to review Medicare and Medicaid billing practices at both the county health department and Sunny Hill Nursing Home, aiming to maximize reimbursements and address...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

County Receives First $50,000 Administrative Fee from Joliet Arsenal Enterprise Zone

Will County will collect its first $50,000 administrative fee from a business utilizing the Joliet Arsenal Enterprise Zone, after the Finance Committee approved appropriating the payment to the Land Use...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

Will County Finance Committee News Briefs

County Property Tax Base Grows to $30.5 Billion: The county's net equalized assessed value (EAV) for the 2025 fiscal year reached $30.5 billion, finance officials reported during discussion of final...