Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to Illinois public transport gun ban
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to decide whether individuals can carry firearms on public transportation.
The court declined to take up Schoenthal v. Raoul, which challenges an Illinois law banning citizens from carrying firearms on public transportation. Three Illinois residents challenged the ban, arguing it violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
“There is no historical tradition of banning law-abiding citizens from possessing firearms in crowded public locations where they may be more vulnerable,” lawyers wrote in a petition to the court.
Illinois requires gun owners to acquire a Firearm Owner’s Identification Card and a concealed carry license in order to carry a firearm in public. However, the state bans individuals from carrying a loaded or unsecured firearm onto buses, trains or any other type of public transportation that is paid for in part or whole by public funds.
Kwame Raoul, Illinois’ attorney general, argued the prohibition on guns in public transportation is consistent with the nation’s historical tradition limiting firearms in sensitive places, like court rooms, schools and polling places.
“Like historical sensitive places, public transit features ‘confined areas with a high density of people,’ making firearms ‘exceptionally dangerous,’” Raoul wrote.
Latest News Stories
Dwight Boys, Kankakee Girls Capture Team Titles at Manteno Invite
Irwin Tosses One-Hit Shutout as Beecher Dominates Arthur-Lovington/Atwood-Hammond 15-0
U.S. House Republicans face jam-packed week ahead
Trump again scraps peace talks with Iran
Trump again scraps peace talks with Iran
U.S. Supreme Court to hear TPS for Haiti, Syria Wednesday
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Village of Beecher for April 13, 2026
Fifth Circuit hands Texas another win on border security law
Illinois Rep faces investigation over sexual harassment
Talks with Iran to resume
Return on investment questioned as Chicago Red Line construction begins
WATCH: WA Democrat income tax supporter questions ‘necessity clause’ nixing public vote