Supreme Court allows mail-order abortion drugs
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that women can continue to access abortion drugs through the mail without making an in-person doctor’s visit, while a lawsuit continues against the practice.
Justices on the high court graned two emergency requests from Danco Laboratories and GenProBio, two makers of the abortion drug mifepristone.
The manufacturers challenged a ruling in Lousiana that upheld the state’s ban on prescribing abortion drugs without an in-person doctor’s visit. In 2023, the Biden administration finalized a rule to allow the drugs to be obtained without an in-person visit.
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the majority’s decision. Alito said the litigation limits a state’s ability to make determinations on abortion, as granted in the high court’s 2022 decision that overturned the constitutional right to abortion.
“Louisiana’s efforts have been thwarted by certain medical providers, private organizations, and States that abhor laws like Louisiana’s and seek to undermine their enforcement,” Alito wrote.
Thomas said allowing abortion drugs to be prescribed without an in-person doctors visit is a crime.
“[Danco Laboratories] cannot, in any legally relevant sense, be irreparably harmed by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to commit crimes,” Thomas wrote in his dissent.
In 2023, approximately two-thirds of all abortions in the United States were through medications.
As the case plays out, access to the abortion drug is expected to be uninterrupted until into next year. The high court could be petitioned again to rule on the merits of the lawsuit after litigation begins.
Latest News Stories
Supreme Court rules for Texas in Rio Grande River lawsuit
Trump appoints housing regulator as acting spy chief
Mullin defends $118B Homeland Security budget request
Bill loosens in-state tuition requirements
Illinois Quick Hits: Nine arrested during Naperville teen gathering
Rubio provides few answers to Congress on Iran conflict timeline
Pritzker housing proposal partly stalls amid overreach concerns from localities
HUD shifts $4B homelessness program from ‘Housing First’ to treatment
Poll: Democrats hold slight edge over Rogers in Michigan U.S. Senate race
Swipe fee battle continues after delay, court ruling
Walz appoints members to Operation Metro Surge ‘Truth Council’
$45M included in budget for previously unfunded property tax relief