Illinois slaps limits on non-lawyer investor power in law firms

Illinois slaps limits on non-lawyer investor power in law firms

Spread the love

Illinois has become the latest state to restrict the involvement of private equity and other non-lawyer interests in owning or running law firms, enacting legislation supporters say will help to protect the attorney-client relationship and wall off attorney fees from non-lawyers.

In the closing hours of the spring legislative session, Illinois lawmakers approved the legislation known as House Bill 5487.

In an unusual political alignment, the measure drew support from both the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, which speaks for the state’s influential lawsuit filers, as well as from the group that normally lines up opposite them in court and on political issues, the Illinois Defense Counsel.

Both groups filed so-called witness slips before the Illinois General Assembly in support of HB 5487.

The measure is not yet law, as it must be signed by Gov. JB Pritzker.

Observers, however, say they expect HB5487 will win an easy endorsement from Pritzker.

The legislation explicitly places limits on the creation and use of so-called alternative business structures (ABS) and management services organizations (MSOs) in law firms.

The legislation defines ABS as a business arrangement which allows non-lawyers to own and lead law firms, and MSOs as an arrangement that gives non-lawyers and outside investors ownership interests in a law firm in exchange for providing certain business services to the firm.

HB 5487 doesn’t explicitly forbid law firms from working with MSOs.

But the legislation prohibits non-lawyers and outside investors from interfering in the “professional judgment of attorneys in representing clients; and

From “owning, or determining” or “revealing” client records and “attorney-client communications; and

From hiring or firing attorneys at the firm with which they may have a professional arrangement; and

Charging “any fee to the attorney or law firm that is directly, or indirectly based on the attorneys’ fees, revenues, or profits…”

The measure also would require law firms to disclose to clients if they have an MSO or ABS arrangement that may be still be allowed under state law.

The use of MSOs and ABS have become hot topics in the legal community in recent years.

Business groups, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, for instance, have warned such arrangements would only deepen the involvement of investors in pushing and controlling lawsuits targeted at American companies.

For decades, an ever-growing investment industry have used so-called third party litigation funding to financially back lawsuits in pursuit of potential windfall profits from the funds paid by defendants to settle the lawsuits or under jury verdicts or other judgments.

Business groups and legal reform advocates have warned such outside financing not only warps the legal system, but also threatens the U.S. economy and national security.

So, these groups see the rise of legal services providers operating under ABS to be a new version of that threat, enabling even more direct involvement from private equity and venture capital seeking in the civil justice system.

On the other side, trial lawyers groups have also begun to oppose the use of ABS and MSOs, seeing them as an attempt by private investors to redefine the attorney-client relationship, wrest control of the lawsuit industry and grab a share of attorney fees, as well as the judgments.

As Illinois lawmakers moved this spring to take action, they followed in the path laid by other states, including California and Colorado. Those states passed legislation to address the rise of ABS arrangements in Arizona, which had brought private investment to bear on personal injury cases and other civil actions.

The Arizona ABS system has come under criticism for lack of oversight and financial conflicts of interest, among other critiques.

That system had notably allowed at least one prominent California mass tort firm, Wisner Baum, to spin off some of its business to the ABS known as Eleos Law in Arizona. According to reports, Eleos is 46% owned by non-lawyers and is funded, in part, through 5% of Wisner Baum’s attorney fees.

Eleos reportedly has helped to manage 9,400 lawsuits over alleged injuries caused by the heartburn medication Zantac and 8,450 lawsuits over alleged contamination of baby food.

Such instances helped to spur the legislation in Illinois, as well.

The Illinois Trial Lawyers Association did not issue public statements declaring their support for the legislation or explaining their reasons for registering support for the measure at the General Assembly this spring.

However, the legislation drew the support from some of ITLA’s most prominent legislative allies, including State Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Swansea, and from Illinois House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch.

On the Illinois Defense Counsel side, attorney Dan Cotter, of the firm of Aronberg Goldgehn, of Chicago, said the IDC and ITLA together backed the measure because of its “foundational” nature to “the legal profession.”

Cotter and his colleague, Daniel Patrick Eckler, each entered witness slips before the General Assembly in support of HB 5487. Eckler declined comment, directing questions to Cotter.

Cotter said all sides agreed on the “broader issue of maintaining traditional roles” within the legal system and maintaining “public confidence in the legal system,” by requiring some level of transparency surrounding firm ownership and investor relationships.

Cotter said it was particularly important to address possible ABS-style fee sharing arrangements and to limit non-lawyer control over litigation and limit non-lawyer investor interference in the attorney-client relationship.

Cotter said the lines drawn in the new legislation notably still allow for the involvement of non-lawyer capital investors in the legal business, as long as they don’t interfere with the lawyers’ “professional judgment” in handling cases or law firm business decisions.

“But they can still do a lot of things they are doing,” Cotter said.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

WCO Landfill 8.5.25.1

Will County Receives Detailed Update on Landfill Expansion Investigation

Article Summary: The Will County Landfill Committee received a comprehensive technical update on the site investigation for the planned horizontal expansion of the county landfill, confirming the project remains on...
WCO Landfill 8.5.25.2

Report Finding Few Trucks Littering Sparks Debate on Cleanup Responsibility

Article Summary: A Will County report found that a very small percentage of waste-hauling trucks are the source of litter on roadways near the county landfill, sparking a debate among...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Landfill Committee for August 7, 2025

The Will County Landfill Committee on Thursday heard a detailed technical update on the ongoing investigation for the county landfill expansion, confirming that the complex project remains on schedule. Consultants...
Ad Hoc.8.12.25.3

Water Well, Waste Hauler Ordinances Updated by Will County Committee

Article Summary: The Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee approved updates to chapters governing water well permits and waste hauler reporting, forwarding them to the Executive Committee for consideration. Changes...
Beecher Graphic.3

Beecher to Draft Ordinances Regulating Scooters and Fishing in Village Ponds

Article Summary: The Beecher Village Board is moving to create new local laws governing the use of electric scooters and fishing in village-owned ponds. Citing safety concerns and resident inquiries,...
Beecher Graphic.4

Beecher’s National Night Out Draws Large Crowd to New Police Station

Article Summary: Beecher's National Night Out was a resounding success, drawing a large and enthusiastic crowd to the new Public Safety Facility for the first time. The August 5 event...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Village of Beecher Board of Trustees for July 28 & August 11, 2025

Over its last two meetings, the Beecher Village Board took significant steps on fiscal policy, new local regulations, and community appointments. On July 28, the board unanimously passed an ordinance...
beecher ilinois school board graphic.4

Finance Committee: Beecher Schools Project Balanced Budget, Earmark Funds for Major Projects

Article Summary: The Beecher School District 200-U Finance Committee reviewed a preliminary Fiscal Year 2026 budget that projects a narrow surplus, a significant turnaround from last year's initial deficit forecast....
WCO Finance Aug 5.1

Will County Health Department Seeks $1 Million to Avert ‘Drastic’ Service Cuts from Expiring Grants

ARTICLE SUMMARY: The Will County Health Department is requesting an additional $1 million in county funding for its 2026 budget to prevent the elimination of 11 critical staff positions, warning...
WCO Cap Imp 8.5.1

Will County’s “First-in-Nation” Veterans Center to House Workforce Services, Sparking Debate

ARTICLE SUMMARY: The new Will County Veteran's Assistance & Support Center will also become the home for the county's Workforce Services department, a move officials say will save approximately $250,000 in...
WCO Finance Aug 5.2

Improved Vendor Service Creates $1.2 Million Shortfall in Sheriff’s Medical Budget

ARTICLE SUMMARY: The Will County Sheriff’s Office is facing a more than $1.2 million shortfall in its budget for inmate medical services, a problem officials attribute to an ironic cause:...
WCO P&Z Aug 5.1

Will County Public Works Committee Unveils 25-Year Transportation Plan, Projects $258 Million Gap

ARTICLE SUMMARY: Will County officials have presented "Our Way Forward 2050," a new long-range transportation plan that provides a 25-year vision for infrastructure projects while forecasting a $258 million shortfall in...
WCO Public Safety.4

Will County Animal Protection Services Seeks New Facility Amid “Gaping Wound” of Space Crisis

Article Summary: Will County Animal Protection Services is seeking approval for a new facility, telling a county committee that its current building is critically inadequate for housing animals, leading to...
WCO Cap Imp 8.5.2

Board Confronts Animal Services Crowding, Explores Future Facility Options

ARTICLE SUMMARY: Will County officials are grappling with an ongoing animal housing crisis that has overwhelmed the county’s Animal Protective Services facility, prompting discussions about expansion, new construction, or even repurposing...
WCO Finance Aug 5.3

Will County Board Members Demand Transparency in Cannabis Tax Fund Allocation

ARTICLE SUMMARY: A debate over transparency and process erupted at the Will County Board’s Finance Committee meeting regarding the distribution of local cannabis tax revenue. Board members called for more...