Illinois slaps limits on non-lawyer investor power in law firms

Illinois slaps limits on non-lawyer investor power in law firms

Spread the love

Illinois has become the latest state to restrict the involvement of private equity and other non-lawyer interests in owning or running law firms, enacting legislation supporters say will help to protect the attorney-client relationship and wall off attorney fees from non-lawyers.

In the closing hours of the spring legislative session, Illinois lawmakers approved the legislation known as House Bill 5487.

In an unusual political alignment, the measure drew support from both the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, which speaks for the state’s influential lawsuit filers, as well as from the group that normally lines up opposite them in court and on political issues, the Illinois Defense Counsel.

Both groups filed so-called witness slips before the Illinois General Assembly in support of HB 5487.

The measure is not yet law, as it must be signed by Gov. JB Pritzker.

Observers, however, say they expect HB5487 will win an easy endorsement from Pritzker.

The legislation explicitly places limits on the creation and use of so-called alternative business structures (ABS) and management services organizations (MSOs) in law firms.

The legislation defines ABS as a business arrangement which allows non-lawyers to own and lead law firms, and MSOs as an arrangement that gives non-lawyers and outside investors ownership interests in a law firm in exchange for providing certain business services to the firm.

HB 5487 doesn’t explicitly forbid law firms from working with MSOs.

But the legislation prohibits non-lawyers and outside investors from interfering in the “professional judgment of attorneys in representing clients; and

From “owning, or determining” or “revealing” client records and “attorney-client communications; and

From hiring or firing attorneys at the firm with which they may have a professional arrangement; and

Charging “any fee to the attorney or law firm that is directly, or indirectly based on the attorneys’ fees, revenues, or profits…”

The measure also would require law firms to disclose to clients if they have an MSO or ABS arrangement that may be still be allowed under state law.

The use of MSOs and ABS have become hot topics in the legal community in recent years.

Business groups, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, for instance, have warned such arrangements would only deepen the involvement of investors in pushing and controlling lawsuits targeted at American companies.

For decades, an ever-growing investment industry have used so-called third party litigation funding to financially back lawsuits in pursuit of potential windfall profits from the funds paid by defendants to settle the lawsuits or under jury verdicts or other judgments.

Business groups and legal reform advocates have warned such outside financing not only warps the legal system, but also threatens the U.S. economy and national security.

So, these groups see the rise of legal services providers operating under ABS to be a new version of that threat, enabling even more direct involvement from private equity and venture capital seeking in the civil justice system.

On the other side, trial lawyers groups have also begun to oppose the use of ABS and MSOs, seeing them as an attempt by private investors to redefine the attorney-client relationship, wrest control of the lawsuit industry and grab a share of attorney fees, as well as the judgments.

As Illinois lawmakers moved this spring to take action, they followed in the path laid by other states, including California and Colorado. Those states passed legislation to address the rise of ABS arrangements in Arizona, which had brought private investment to bear on personal injury cases and other civil actions.

The Arizona ABS system has come under criticism for lack of oversight and financial conflicts of interest, among other critiques.

That system had notably allowed at least one prominent California mass tort firm, Wisner Baum, to spin off some of its business to the ABS known as Eleos Law in Arizona. According to reports, Eleos is 46% owned by non-lawyers and is funded, in part, through 5% of Wisner Baum’s attorney fees.

Eleos reportedly has helped to manage 9,400 lawsuits over alleged injuries caused by the heartburn medication Zantac and 8,450 lawsuits over alleged contamination of baby food.

Such instances helped to spur the legislation in Illinois, as well.

The Illinois Trial Lawyers Association did not issue public statements declaring their support for the legislation or explaining their reasons for registering support for the measure at the General Assembly this spring.

However, the legislation drew the support from some of ITLA’s most prominent legislative allies, including State Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Swansea, and from Illinois House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch.

On the Illinois Defense Counsel side, attorney Dan Cotter, of the firm of Aronberg Goldgehn, of Chicago, said the IDC and ITLA together backed the measure because of its “foundational” nature to “the legal profession.”

Cotter and his colleague, Daniel Patrick Eckler, each entered witness slips before the General Assembly in support of HB 5487. Eckler declined comment, directing questions to Cotter.

Cotter said all sides agreed on the “broader issue of maintaining traditional roles” within the legal system and maintaining “public confidence in the legal system,” by requiring some level of transparency surrounding firm ownership and investor relationships.

Cotter said it was particularly important to address possible ABS-style fee sharing arrangements and to limit non-lawyer control over litigation and limit non-lawyer investor interference in the attorney-client relationship.

Cotter said the lines drawn in the new legislation notably still allow for the involvement of non-lawyer capital investors in the legal business, as long as they don’t interfere with the lawyers’ “professional judgment” in handling cases or law firm business decisions.

“But they can still do a lot of things they are doing,” Cotter said.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Washington Township Board of Trustees for May 5, 2025

The Washington Township Board of Trustees paused a decision on a major security upgrade, approved community sponsorships, and discussed the future of its senior events at its meeting on Monday,...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 3.03.49 PM

County Approves $4.3 Million Purchase of Wetland Banking Credits for Highway Projects

The Will County Public Works and Transportation Committee has approved an agreement to purchase wetland banking site credits for $4,324,550 from V3 Wetland Restoration LLC to support future county highway...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Beecher Fire Protection District Board of Trustees for March 20, 2025

The Beecher Fire Protection District is preparing for changes in its leadership and staffing after the Board of Trustees on March 20 approved the creation of a new Lieutenant position....
Beecher Fire Protection District graphic.1

Beecher Fire District to Hire New Lieutenant, Approves Updated Appointment Process

Article Summary: The Beecher Fire Protection District Board of Trustees has authorized the creation of a new Lieutenant position and will begin accepting applications at the end of March. The...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.01.41 PM

Labor Representative Addresses County Committee on Public Transportation Reform Efforts

JOLIET — A labor representative warned Will County officials Thursday that proposed reforms to regional public transportation governance could diminish the county's voice in transit decisions during a presentation to...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.01.41 PM

Committee Advances $1.7 Million Upgrade Plan for River Valley Juvenile Detention Center

JOLIET — The Will County Executive Committee voted Thursday to advance a $1.7 million proposal to upgrade the River Valley Juvenile Detention Center rather than pursuing costlier alternatives to house...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.01.41 PM

County Executive Committee Briefs: Transportation Program Expands, Ordinances Updated

Mobility Management Program Expands to Three Townships: The Executive Committee approved an intergovernmental agreement to expand the Will County Mobility Management Program to include Channahon, Manhattan, and Plainfield townships. The...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.01.41 PM

County Executive Committee Advances Elected Officials’ Pay Increases After Extended Debate

The Will County Executive Committee voted Thursday to advance a proposal for pay increases for countywide elected officials and county board members, setting the stage for a final vote at...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.01.41 PM

County Considers Bond Refinancing That Could Save Millions

JOLIET — Will County officials on Thursday discussed a potential bond refinancing opportunity that could save the county approximately $3.6 million in debt service costs by taking advantage of favorable...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.14.20 PM

Will County Ordinance Committee Briefs: Unanimous Votes for Proclamations, Title Changes, Audits Discussed

Committee Clarifies Unanimous Vote Requirement for Honorary Proclamations: The Ordinance Committee refined language in Chapter 30 regarding honorary proclamations, specifying that they shall be allowed "only by unanimous vote" of...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.14.20 PM

County Undertakes Formatting Overhaul of Decades-Old Ordinances

JOLIET — Will County officials are modernizing the format and structure of the county's ordinances, some of which date back to 1943, as part of a comprehensive review process to...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.14.20 PM

County Reviews Rules on Virtual Meeting Attendance, Committee Participation

JOLIET — Will County officials discovered Thursday that their current practices regarding virtual meeting attendance may not fully comply with state law, as the Ordinance Committee worked through updates to...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.14.20 PM

Will County Ordinance Committee Reviews Administrative Code, Clarifies Official Powers

JOLIET — The Will County Ordinance Committee spent several hours Thursday reviewing and updating Chapter 30 of the county's Code of Ordinances, which governs county administration, with particular attention to...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.17.47 PM

Farmers, Residents Call for Action on Roadside Debris from Landfill Trucks

Local farmers and residents are urging county officials to address persistent litter problems along routes used by trucks traveling to and from Prairie View landfill. The issue emerged during public...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.17.47 PM

County Landfill Meeting Briefs

Landfill Minutes Approved: The landfill committee unanimously approved minutes from its February 11, 2025 meeting. All committee members were present, including Hickey, Brooks, Bulock, Logan, Newquest, Pretzel, and Dean Schlotman....