Illinois slaps limits on non-lawyer investor power in law firms

Illinois slaps limits on non-lawyer investor power in law firms

Spread the love

Illinois has become the latest state to restrict the involvement of private equity and other non-lawyer interests in owning or running law firms, enacting legislation supporters say will help to protect the attorney-client relationship and wall off attorney fees from non-lawyers.

In the closing hours of the spring legislative session, Illinois lawmakers approved the legislation known as House Bill 5487.

In an unusual political alignment, the measure drew support from both the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, which speaks for the state’s influential lawsuit filers, as well as from the group that normally lines up opposite them in court and on political issues, the Illinois Defense Counsel.

Both groups filed so-called witness slips before the Illinois General Assembly in support of HB 5487.

The measure is not yet law, as it must be signed by Gov. JB Pritzker.

Observers, however, say they expect HB5487 will win an easy endorsement from Pritzker.

The legislation explicitly places limits on the creation and use of so-called alternative business structures (ABS) and management services organizations (MSOs) in law firms.

The legislation defines ABS as a business arrangement which allows non-lawyers to own and lead law firms, and MSOs as an arrangement that gives non-lawyers and outside investors ownership interests in a law firm in exchange for providing certain business services to the firm.

HB 5487 doesn’t explicitly forbid law firms from working with MSOs.

But the legislation prohibits non-lawyers and outside investors from interfering in the “professional judgment of attorneys in representing clients; and

From “owning, or determining” or “revealing” client records and “attorney-client communications; and

From hiring or firing attorneys at the firm with which they may have a professional arrangement; and

Charging “any fee to the attorney or law firm that is directly, or indirectly based on the attorneys’ fees, revenues, or profits…”

The measure also would require law firms to disclose to clients if they have an MSO or ABS arrangement that may be still be allowed under state law.

The use of MSOs and ABS have become hot topics in the legal community in recent years.

Business groups, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, for instance, have warned such arrangements would only deepen the involvement of investors in pushing and controlling lawsuits targeted at American companies.

For decades, an ever-growing investment industry have used so-called third party litigation funding to financially back lawsuits in pursuit of potential windfall profits from the funds paid by defendants to settle the lawsuits or under jury verdicts or other judgments.

Business groups and legal reform advocates have warned such outside financing not only warps the legal system, but also threatens the U.S. economy and national security.

So, these groups see the rise of legal services providers operating under ABS to be a new version of that threat, enabling even more direct involvement from private equity and venture capital seeking in the civil justice system.

On the other side, trial lawyers groups have also begun to oppose the use of ABS and MSOs, seeing them as an attempt by private investors to redefine the attorney-client relationship, wrest control of the lawsuit industry and grab a share of attorney fees, as well as the judgments.

As Illinois lawmakers moved this spring to take action, they followed in the path laid by other states, including California and Colorado. Those states passed legislation to address the rise of ABS arrangements in Arizona, which had brought private investment to bear on personal injury cases and other civil actions.

The Arizona ABS system has come under criticism for lack of oversight and financial conflicts of interest, among other critiques.

That system had notably allowed at least one prominent California mass tort firm, Wisner Baum, to spin off some of its business to the ABS known as Eleos Law in Arizona. According to reports, Eleos is 46% owned by non-lawyers and is funded, in part, through 5% of Wisner Baum’s attorney fees.

Eleos reportedly has helped to manage 9,400 lawsuits over alleged injuries caused by the heartburn medication Zantac and 8,450 lawsuits over alleged contamination of baby food.

Such instances helped to spur the legislation in Illinois, as well.

The Illinois Trial Lawyers Association did not issue public statements declaring their support for the legislation or explaining their reasons for registering support for the measure at the General Assembly this spring.

However, the legislation drew the support from some of ITLA’s most prominent legislative allies, including State Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Swansea, and from Illinois House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch.

On the Illinois Defense Counsel side, attorney Dan Cotter, of the firm of Aronberg Goldgehn, of Chicago, said the IDC and ITLA together backed the measure because of its “foundational” nature to “the legal profession.”

Cotter and his colleague, Daniel Patrick Eckler, each entered witness slips before the General Assembly in support of HB 5487. Eckler declined comment, directing questions to Cotter.

Cotter said all sides agreed on the “broader issue of maintaining traditional roles” within the legal system and maintaining “public confidence in the legal system,” by requiring some level of transparency surrounding firm ownership and investor relationships.

Cotter said it was particularly important to address possible ABS-style fee sharing arrangements and to limit non-lawyer control over litigation and limit non-lawyer investor interference in the attorney-client relationship.

Cotter said the lines drawn in the new legislation notably still allow for the involvement of non-lawyer capital investors in the legal business, as long as they don’t interfere with the lawyers’ “professional judgment” in handling cases or law firm business decisions.

“But they can still do a lot of things they are doing,” Cotter said.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Will County Board Graphic.04

Behavioral Health Division Drops Wait Times, Reports Zero Opioid Deaths in February

Public Health & Safety Committee Meeting | March 5, 2026 Article Summary: Will County’s Behavioral Health Division reported significant operational improvements, including a near-elimination of wait times for therapy and...
Will County Board Graphic.03

Harris Drive Residents Plead for County Intervention Amid Failing Septic Systems and Flooding

Public Health & Safety Committee Meeting | March 5, 2026 Article Summary: Residents of Harris Drive appealed to the Public Health and Safety Committee for help with severe seasonal flooding...
Beecher Fire Protection District graphic.4

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Beecher Fire Protection District for Jan. 22, 2026

Beecher Fire Protection District Meeting | Jan. 22, 2026 The Beecher Fire Protection District Board of Trustees met on Thursday, January 22, 2026, for a brief but productive session that...
Police Crime

Will County Sheriff’s Office Investigates Fatal Hit-and-Run in Homer Glen

Article Summary: The Will County Sheriff’s Office is seeking the public's assistance in identifying a driver involved in a fatal hit-and-run crash in Homer Glen that left a pedestrian dead....
will county Committee-Public Health & Safety.Graphic

Federal Funding Freezes Threaten Will County Public Health Programs Amid Ongoing Lawsuits

Public Health & Safety Committee Meeting | March 5, 2026 Article Summary: Will County health officials are bracing for potential service disruptions as they monitor multiple federal lawsuits surrounding frozen...
Beecher Fire Protection District graphic.2

New Brush Truck Expected in March as Training Hours Top 16,000

Beecher Fire Protection District Meeting | Jan. 22, 2026 Article Summary: Deputy Chief Mike Heusing updated the Board on the imminent delivery of a new brush truck and reported impressive...
Beecher Graphic.3

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Village of Beecher Board for Feb 23, 2026

Village of Beecher Board Meeting | Feb 23, 2026 Meeting SummaryThe Beecher Village Board convened on Monday, February 23, 2026, for a session dominated by fiscal planning and infrastructure updates....
Beecher Graphic.3

Board Pauses Noise Ordinance Changes as Truck Issue Subsides

Village of Beecher Board Meeting | Feb 23, 2026 Article Summary: The Beecher Village Board decided to pause proposed changes to the village noise ordinance after determining that specific complaints...
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Single Bid of $64,200 Received for Library Entrance Project

Beecher Public Library District Bid Opening Meeting | Feb. 12, 2026 Article Summary: The Beecher Public Library District received just one bid for its Main Front Entrance Project, coming in...
Will County Board Federal Agenda

Board Splits Along Party Lines to Approve 2026 Federal Legislative Agenda

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board adopted its 2026 Federal Legislative Agenda in a 10-9 vote, establishing the county's priorities for lobbying efforts...
Will County Board Graphic.01

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Landfill Committee for February 10, 2026

Will County Landfill Committee Meeting | February 10, 2026 The Will County Landfill Committee met on Tuesday to address legal preparations for the upcoming landfill expansion and operational needs at...
Beecher Fire Protection District graphic.1

Beecher Trustees Renew Fire Chief’s Contract and Update Fire Code

Beecher Fire Protection District Meeting | Jan. 22, 2026 Article Summary: The Beecher Fire Protection District Board of Trustees voted unanimously to renew the employment contract for Fire Chief Joe...
Will County Board Graphic.03

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board for February 19, 2026

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Meeting SummaryThe Will County Board meeting on Thursday, February 19, 2026, was marked by significant zoning decisions, including the unanimous rejection of...
Will County Board Graphic.04

Board Approves Joliet Township Clean Fill Facility Despite Environmental Objections

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board approved a map amendment and special use permit for a Clean Construction and Demolition Debris (CCDD) facility...
solar panels photovoltaics in solar farm

Will County Board Unanimously Rejects Controversial Solar Farm in Troy Township

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board unanimously rejected a special use permit for a commercial solar energy facility near Shorewood following strong opposition...