California sues over construction of alleged ICE facility

California sues over construction of alleged ICE facility

Spread the love

California is suing U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies to stop construction of what plaintiffs say is an ICE holding facility near an agricultural city.

Blueprints show plans for some kind of federal facility, but the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said it isn’t building a new detention center.

Santa Clara County, the rural Central California county that would be home to the alleged administrative and short-term detainment facility, joined California Attorney General Rob Bonta in the lawsuit, which also names DHS, the U.S. General Services Administration, three federal officials and the Beverly Hills-based company ECG 6 LLC as defendants. GSA is the agency that builds federal facilities.

“The action taking place in [the] county is unlawful, and spreads fear throughout our county,” Otto Lee, the chair of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, told The Center Square.

“This project was being developed secretly, and violates the National Environmental Policy Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, the Administrative Procedure Act and California’s Williamson Act, to name a few,” Lee said.

In the lawsuit, the county and the California Department of Justice challenged the development of what appears to be a facility for holding illegal immigrants in the 7200 block of Holsclaw Road in unincorporated Santa Clara County. According to the complaint, the federal agencies involved with the development violated numerous laws, including California’s Williamson Act, which has limited the site on Holsclaw Road to strictly agricultural uses since 1967.

The suspected holding facility is expected to be around 18,700 square feet, according to the lawsuit, and will hold up to 150 detainees. The complaint also alleges that the facility site is in an area that is home to endangered species and has limited and inadequate waste disposal capabilities. There is also hazardous waste present on site, notably a toxic fungicide called thiram, ethidium bromide, calcium hypochlorite and acid-based chemical wash water, the complaint states.

Construction started on May 4, the complaint further alleges. The lawsuit contends federal officials with knowledge of the project concealed its true nature.

“We have no new detention centers planned at this location,” a spokesperson from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security told The Center Square via email on Thursday. The department declined to identify the spokesperson by name.

“Every day, DHS is conducting law enforcement activities across the country to keep Americans safe,” said the DHS spokesperson. “It should not come as news that ICE will be making arrests in states across the U.S. and is actively working to expand detention space.”

Public records from the General Services Administration show that a facility is indeed planned at the site, with blueprints showing that there are parts of building construction with labels like “man trap” and “ammunition/weapons suite.” There are also rooms in the blueprints labeled “visitor room” and “interview room.”

Big type on the blueprints say “Construction Documents. GSA. General Services Administration. Gilroy, California.”

“What I understand this would be is a federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement processing center outside of Gilroy,” said Greg Bozzo, mayor of Gilroy.

“I understand it to be a facility that, in my opinion, and in the opinion of our city council, is located in the wrong place,” Bozzo told The Center Square on Thursday. “The majority of our community is in alignment with our city council, which voted unanimously to pass a resolution opposing this facility in this location.”

Bozzo said Gilroy’s residents, many of whom are immigrants, have shared concerns with him about construction moving ahead on this facility.

“Gilroy is a community that is known for caring for one another,” Bozzo said. “We are a strong-knit community where people know each other, and we are concerned for everyone for the type of anxiety that this is bringing to our community.”

Santa Clara County officials have jurisdiction over the facility because it is being built on county land and in an unincorporated area. They said they share the same concerns as Gilroy officials. The federal government is leasing the land from the county.

“Our office has a long history of litigation around immigrant rights issues,” Tony Lopresti, county counsel for Santa Clara County, told The Center Square. “Our county has pretty much the largest ratio of foreign-born residents in the nation at 42%. Our board is a board that very much understands that immigrant community is at the core of our county’s identity.”

The Santa Clara County Counsel’s Office previously sued the Trump administration for its actions against immigrant communities, which affects many residents, Lopresti said. He and other county officials also said there was no communication or outreach from the federal government to the county in the plans to build a potential Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Gilroy.

“At the very least, we would expect they would comply with the applicable laws,” Lopresti said. “It requires they seek out and consider the perspectives of local and state government, that they evaluate alternative locations, whether they could use existing locations.

“They did none of that,” Lopresti said. “They just proceeded under full secrecy to ram through a project.”

The California Department of Justice, which is overseen by Bonta, and ICE did not respond to The Center Square’s requests for comment.

The GSA responded via email on Thursday afternoon that it does not comment on active litigation.

Lawyers from the San Francisco-based law firm Shute, Mihaley and Weinberger, a law firm representing the plaintiffs in the case, did not respond to The Center Square.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.57.14 PM

County Reports Significant Cost Savings Through In-House Facility Projects

Will County is achieving substantial cost savings by completing facility improvement projects with in-house staff rather than contracting the work out, according to a presentation to the Capital Improvements Committee...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.50.36 PM

County Legislative Committee Endorses Electronic Recycling Bill, Reviews Transit Governance

The Will County Legislative Committee voted Thursday to support proposed state legislation that would extend and expand Illinois' electronic recycling program, while also reviewing potential changes to regional transit governance...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.57.14 PM

Will County Capital Improvements News Briefs

Courthouse Scaffolding Expected to Come Down Soon: Scaffolding on one corner of the Will County Courthouse should be removed within the next two weeks, pending reports from material scientists. "We're...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

County Finance Committee Advances Proposal for Elected Official Pay Raises After 20-Year Freeze

The Will County Finance Committee voted Thursday to advance a proposal that would provide the first salary increases for countywide elected officials and county board members in nearly two decades....
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.50.36 PM

Will County Committee Debates Process for Taking Positions on State Legislation

Will County Legislative Committee members engaged in substantial discussion Thursday about how the committee should review and take positions on state legislation, with several members expressing concerns about the process...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.50.36 PM

State Lobbyists Update County on Springfield Action as Legislative Deadlines Approach

County officials received a comprehensive update on pending state legislation Thursday as lawmakers in Springfield approach critical deadlines for moving bills forward this session. Representatives from Mac Strategies, the county's...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.50.36 PM

Will County Legislative Committee News Briefs

Committee Postpones Action on Felony Conviction Voting Rights Bill: The Will County Legislative Committee declined to support House Bill 1288, which would allow individuals convicted of felonies to run for...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

Shanahan Development Agreements Near Completion, Will County to See $282,000 Annual Revenue Boost

Will County will soon begin receiving the full tax benefit from industrial developments in Shanahan as the tax abatement and rebate agreements that helped fund infrastructure improvements approach their completion...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

County Explores Bond Refinancing Options to Generate Potential Savings

Will County officials are exploring opportunities to refinance existing debt that could generate significant savings through two separate financial strategies, according to presentations to the Finance Committee on Thursday. Financial...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

County Approves $150,000 for Medicare/Medicaid Billing Consultant for Health Department, Nursing Home

Will County will hire a consultant to review Medicare and Medicaid billing practices at both the county health department and Sunny Hill Nursing Home, aiming to maximize reimbursements and address...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

County Receives First $50,000 Administrative Fee from Joliet Arsenal Enterprise Zone

Will County will collect its first $50,000 administrative fee from a business utilizing the Joliet Arsenal Enterprise Zone, after the Finance Committee approved appropriating the payment to the Land Use...
Screenshot 2025-05-04 at 2.44.33 PM

Will County Finance Committee News Briefs

County Property Tax Base Grows to $30.5 Billion: The county's net equalized assessed value (EAV) for the 2025 fiscal year reached $30.5 billion, finance officials reported during discussion of final...