U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Washington parental rights case
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a case challenging Washington state laws that allow minors to access mental health and gender-affirming care without consent from a parent.
Justices on the high court agreed to hear International Partners for Ethical Care v. Ferguson, a case that challenges three Washington laws regulating the rights of minors seeking mental health care and shelter services, specifically among minors who are transgender.
The high court will examine three laws challenged in the suit: one permitting minors who are at least 13 years old to receive “outpatient treatment” without parental consent; another law requires overnight shelters to reach out to the state instead of parents if a child runs away to seek “protected” health care, including gender-affirming care; and the third law allows children to stay in shelters for up to 90 days.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to take up a challenge to Washington’s laws last summer. Several justices on the 9th Circuit dissented from the decision not to hear the case.
“Washington’s legal regime governing gender-confused children now empowers its state-run shelters to hide minors from parents and to encourage them to travel further down the path of gender ideology,” Judges Eric Tung, Patrick Bumatay and Lawrence VanDyke wrote in a dissenting opinion.
The nation’s highest court previously upheld bans on minors from receiving hormones in an effort to transition genders. The court also heard a case challenging state bans on males who identify as females competing in women’s and girls’ sports.
“Washington’s legal regime therefore chills the rights of these parents to direct the care and upbringing of their children, strikes at the heart of what the parental right protects, and constitutes a current and ongoing invasion of the parents’ constitutional rights,” the judges wrote in their dissent.
Justices on the high court are expected to hear the case out in the fall or early 2027. A decision will likely be issued by June 2027.
Latest News Stories
Entrepreneur’s supporters say case law may result in release
GOP lawmakers silent on Trump’s EO punishing state AI guardrails
Gabbard: 2,000 Afghan refugees in U.S. have ties to terrorism
Op-Ed: No more CDL mills: Trump’s DOT puts safety back in the driver’s seat
Illinois Gov. Pritzker signs assisted suicide bill
Hochul weighs AI regulations as Trump sets federal rules
EXCLUSIVE: First Nation police chiefs want to participate in border security efforts
Justice Department sues Fulton County over election records
USPS electric fleet push sparks cost, security and job concerns
WATCH: Use of Guard debated; Trump singles out Pritzker on AI; Property tax ruling
Illinois quick hits: Chicago Fed president explains vote; Treasurer encourages Bright Start gifts
EXCLUSIVE: Canadian groups, First Nation police support stronger border security