Public pushback to Flock cameras spark variety of government responses
(The Center Square) – Across the country, opposition to license plate cameras created by Flock Safety is mounting. Major cities and small communities alike are deciding to end their contracts with the company – Illinois being no exception.
Cities in Illinois, such as Oak Park and Evanston, have chosen to end contracts with the company, even as police departments have said they’re a useful tool in law enforcement.
In Springfield, aldermen were at odds in recent weeks over an ordinance to renew their contract with Flock for two years, costing taxpayers half a million dollars.
On Tuesday, council passed the measure while allowing for more transparency and regular public reports on the cameras’ effectiveness.
“It’s some simple things, and I’m just asking that to be standard and be given to us on multiple things. Transparency, equitable – making sure that these things are fair – and also reporting back to us so we as a council can, come budget time, look to address these things,” said Alderman Shawn Gregory.
Gregory was opposed to renewing the contract, but he said he was able to draft a plan for transparency based on guidance from organizations like the ACLU.
The council negotiated changes with the police department during the meeting, and passed it with two members opposed to any stipulations.
In contrast, the Madison, Wisconsin, area recently ended their partnership with Flock over data privacy risks and outside access.
Andrew Dodd, a Springfield deputy chief, said the data collected by Flock is stored on servers operated by the company, but there are security measures such as data deletion after 30 days.
He confirmed there are limits on access, aside from departments within 50 miles of the city.
“Our standard right now is within 50 miles. If an agency gets Flock, they can get access to ours because of how close we are. Outside of that 50 mile radius within the state of Illinois, even Illinois agencies have to send a request,” Dodd said.
Some aldermen still had concerns over the level of access by other agencies.
A 2025 audit by the secretary of state found federal authorities accessed data collected by Illinois-based ALPRs in partnership with Flock – in violation of state law.
Dodd said federal agencies can’t access their database – at least directly.
“Our officers that are assigned to the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force, they should be able to access the system. Even though they’re assigned to work with the FBI, it’s a powerful tool,” Dodd said. “I don’t think we can carve them out of this.”
Community members expressed worry that, even with data safety and privacy measures, cameras have been used illegally by officers within departments nationwide, including in Illinois.
William Copp, a police chief in McHenry county, was recently alleged to have made unauthorized searches in a department database in order to track former romantic partners and others.
Copp was charged over the reported hundreds of unauthorized searches he made, many while off-duty, according to local media reporting.
Springfield’s council voted unanimously to renew the contract for two years, despite continued calls from residents to remove the cameras.
Latest News Stories
Norkus Strikes Out 16 in One-Hit Masterpiece as Beecher Downs Donovan 10-1
Carmela Irwin Throws One-Hitter as Beecher Offense Erupts in 18-1 Rout of Donovan
Texas congressional delegation calls for federal investigation into H-1B visa fraud
Foxx: Prosecutors’ ‘silence’ on murder exonerations doesn’t mean ‘innocent’
Illinois Quick Hits: ISU union workers reach deal, return to work
Trump’s Iran objective moves from ‘surrender’ to nuclear deal
Democrats demand answers from Trump on consumer costs of Iran conflict
Illinois Dems eye $7B from new tax proposals, push ‘Billionaire Wealth Tax’
Plan would have state taxpayers provide $50M for ICE-impacted businesses
Homan threatens crackdown if New York limits ICE cooperation
Feds sue Colorado over ban on certain firearm magazines
Group calls for clear lines of authority after UVA member’s communications released