Supreme Court declines challenge to California’s congressional map
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to California’s redistricting bid that would add more Democrat-majority districts in the state.
In November, California voters approved Proposition 50, a ballot measure that allowed mid-decade congressional redistricting. The measure was proposed by the Democrat-led General Assembly to add as many as five congressional districts in favor of Democrats.
The California Legislature took up the effort after legislators in Texas redrew congressional maps to add as many as five districts in favor of Republicans. However, lawyers for the Trump administration urged justices on the Supreme Court to strike down California’s map.
The lawyers argued Prop. 50, the California ballot measure to approve the new congressional district lines, made distinctions on race and should be classified as racial gerrymandering. Prop. 50 passed with nearly 65% of the vote in the Nov. 4 general election.
“An injunction effectively requiring California to return to its earlier map would be less disruptive to the State’s election apparatus than allowing the Prop 50 map to go into effect,” the lawyers wrote.
“Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” California Democrats wrote. “With a majority in the House, Democrats can fight back against Trump and Republicans’ MAGA agenda.”
Latest News Stories
Smith & Wesson wins appeal chance in Highland Park lawsuits
Illinois Republicans say federal student data probe may reach Illinois State after Tufts review
Washington Township Trustees Move to Create Official Emails to Comply with FOIA
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Public Works & Transportation Committee for February 3, 2026
Beecher Board Discusses Plans for Police Station Sale Proceeds
Chicago aldermen call out transportation dept. over Complete Streets, bike lanes
Exclusive: Teachers forced to un-teach social media claims
Illinois quick hits: Moody’s predicts static job growth in Illinois
Trump’s proposed firing rule could save taxpayers $6.1 million yearly
‘Very selfish’: EU sanctions on Russia fertilizer will weaken U.S., food security
Seattle’s FIFA World Cup 2026 windfall: Opportunities and risks
WATCH: ‘Waters Edge’ tax breaks would end if California bill passes