GOP congressional candidate calls single-stream recycling a ‘sham’
(The Center Square) – Republican congressional candidate Angel Oakley says much of the material Americans place in recycling bins ultimately ends up in landfills, arguing the current single-stream recycling system is misleading taxpayers and consumers.
Oakley said contamination in single-stream recycling – where plastics, glass, paper and metal are combined in one bin – often makes materials unusable for recycling.
“A majority of them actually end up in the landfill, and that’s for plastics and also for glass,” Oakley said. “There are so many people that go out of their way to recycle. They think they’re doing a good thing … and yet it ends up in the landfill anyway, and it is costing us tax dollars.”
Oakley pointed to contamination problems caused by broken glass, improperly cleaned containers and plastic bags clogging sorting equipment. She said the shift to single-stream recycling was designed to increase participation rates but came at the expense of effectiveness.
“The way legislation is written, the EPA provides funding to local municipalities for recycling services, and then those municipalities contract with companies like Waste Management to provide that service,” Oakley said. “It’s more or less a checkmark – are you providing the service or not – but it’s not necessarily looking at the effectiveness of the recycled materials being reused.”
Oakley contrasted modern recycling programs with older systems that required residents to separate materials themselves or bring recyclables to designated facilities.
She also cited bottle deposit programs, such as those once used by Oberweis and those currently operating in states including California and Michigan, as examples of more effective reuse systems.
“One thing that we could benefit from is having a national deposit program,” Oakley said, arguing a federal system could prevent cross-border abuse that can occur between states with different bottle deposit laws.
While Oakley said recycling reform is not among her top campaign priorities, she described environmental stewardship as an area where Republicans and Democrats can find common ground.
“It is ultimately part of our land stewardship, which is incredibly important just in general as far as keeping our air, water and soil preserved for our children in the future,” she said.
Latest News Stories
Smith & Wesson wins appeal chance in Highland Park lawsuits
Illinois Republicans say federal student data probe may reach Illinois State after Tufts review
Washington Township Trustees Move to Create Official Emails to Comply with FOIA
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Public Works & Transportation Committee for February 3, 2026
Beecher Board Discusses Plans for Police Station Sale Proceeds
Chicago aldermen call out transportation dept. over Complete Streets, bike lanes
Exclusive: Teachers forced to un-teach social media claims
Illinois quick hits: Moody’s predicts static job growth in Illinois
Trump’s proposed firing rule could save taxpayers $6.1 million yearly
‘Very selfish’: EU sanctions on Russia fertilizer will weaken U.S., food security
Seattle’s FIFA World Cup 2026 windfall: Opportunities and risks
WATCH: ‘Waters Edge’ tax breaks would end if California bill passes